Peachy Reads

The mysterious figure of Bertha Mason provides much of the tension in Jane Eyre , but what does the reader really know about her?  Rochester provides some details of her past, but is his account reliable?  Caribbean author Jean Rhys attempted to tell the story of Rochester's insane (and perhaps misunderstood) wife in her 1966 novel Wide Sargasso Sea .  It's a sort of prequel to Jane Eyre .  I'm afraid Rochester doesn't come out looking good, though we always knew he had a bit of a wild side with his continental dalliances.  Anyway, there's a lot of interesting backstory about Bertha's origins in Jamaica, her real name, the tragic circumstances of her upbringing, and how she was established at Thornfield Hall.  Gosh, if Jane had only known all these details about Rochester, she might have taken St. John up on his offer of marriage.  All in all, Wide Sargasso Sea is pretty credible, but I missed Charlotte Bronte's flowery language, and of course the char

Jane Eyre .  I've seen several film versions of it, but until now I'd never read the novel.  Shame on me.  I was motivated to read it after it appeared on my daughter's English literature syllabus this year.  I didn't read it simultaneously with her class, but nearly so-- I was a month or two late.  Most literature from the 1800s always frightened me off in the past ( Jane Eyre was published in 1847), and I'm still not over my somewhat inexplicable Dickens-phobia (but maybe I'm coming closer to a cure).  Jane Eyre is amazingly accessible and a real page-turner full of unique characters and plot-twists.  Of course, I knew the secret of the madwoman in the attic, but what a treat it must have been in 1847 to read it with no spoilers.  Such suspense!  It really is a haunting story, full of tragedy, but one that is full of life and love as well.  I think I would have to say it's definitely a girls' book and I was surprised at some of the hints at femini

I can’t remember where I saw the review for this.  Somehow it caught my eye, but in retrospect I’m not sure why.  I've already had the sermon on the ubiquity of corn in our diet from Michael Pollan.  In the opening chapters of  Wheat Belly , William Davis explains how wheat has been so radically hybridized and modified in the last half of the twentieth century, that it little resembles the grain that our grandparents consumed and used as flour.  The “wonder wheat” that grows with tremendous yields worldwide is a gen-modified stubby dwarf variety that is resistant to disease, winds and stormfall (no amber waves of grain anymore) and will not grow without generous allotments of chemical fertilizer (no surprise there). No studies have ever been conducted on this superwheat’s compatibility with human digestion, since its fundamental makeup is radically different from its forebears. Davis suggests that eliminating wheat, all wheat, from our diet has manifold benefits, even for those wh